Skip to main content

Citizens for Legitimate Government

A multi-partisan activist group established to expose and resist US imperialism, corpora-terrorism, and the New World Order

 

 

Click here!

 

Contribute to CLG

 

 

CLG Breaking News and Commentary

Navigation

User login

NASA Flight Director Confirms 9/11 Aircraft Speed As "Elephant In the Room"

July 1, 2010 by legitgov

ShareThis

NASA Flight Director Confirms 9/11 Aircraft Speed As "Elephant In the Room" By Pilots For 9/11 Truth 22 Jun 2010 Recently, Pilots For 9/11 Truth have analyzed the speeds reported for the aircraft utilized on 9/11. Numerous aviation experts have voiced their concerns regarding the extremely excessive speeds reported above Maximum Operating for the 757 and 767, particularly, United and American Airlines 757/767 Captains who have actual flight time in all 4 aircraft reportedly used on 9/11. These experts state the speeds are impossible to achieve near sea level in thick air if the aircraft were a standard 757/767 as reported. Combined with the fact the airplane which was reported to strike the south tower of the World Trade Center was also producing high G Loading while turning and pulling out from a dive, the whole issue becomes incomprehensible to fathom a standard 767 can perform such maneuvers at such intense speeds exceeding Maximum Operating limits of the aircraft.

Comments

Conversation with Dwain Deets:

July 20, 2010 by shure, 2 years 47 weeks ago
Comment: 522

I was able to talk with Dwain Deets about the article and get some clarification on the plane issues:

Listen to the conversation here:

http://s1.zetaboards.com/pumpitout/topic/3611382/

 

.

Re: When do planes "break"?

July 2, 2010 by Anonymous, 2 years 50 weeks ago
Comment: 415

Read post 65 in the discussion thread linked at the Pilots For Truth forum in the above article.

When do planes "break"?

July 2, 2010 by Anonymous, 2 years 50 weeks ago
Comment: 412

Just because an aircraft performs a maneuver that produces forces outside of it's flight envelope, it DOES NOT necessarily follow that the aircraft will (or must) immediately energetically disassemble. It is this designed reliability that we all count on to make flying as safe as it is.

Ooh, ooh - I know...

July 1, 2010 by Anonymous, 2 years 50 weeks ago
Comment: 411

The first "plane" (AA) to hit was actually a remotely controlled drone, as seen in the blurred Naudet video. The second plane (United) actually passed by to the west of the South Tower, flying at normal speed. This plane did NOT hit the WTC, and videos which show a high-speed hit are doctored.

Premium Drupal Themes by Adaptivethemes